Over the course of a few beautiful Montana weekends in August and September, we’re digging in and getting tons of prep work and site beautification done, before construction starts in earnest.
So much incredibly hard work, joyful cooperation, and quality outcomes! It has been a great pleasure to see, hear, and participate in our work days, and really inspiring to note all the expertise, determination, and good humor we have in our community.
Here are the things that got done, in no particular order, with big, huge bouquets of gratitude to everyone who came and worked, and everyone from afar who supported us.
Endless thistle pulling and bagging
Multiple runs for food and drinks
Tender collection of irises and garden beets
Heroic clean-out of the tack and vet rooms
Trash collection in the house garage
Digging the deepest well spigot hole ever
Keeping track of the epic swirl of so many happy kids
Enthusiastic demolition of paddock leftovers and constructing a new paddock fence
Perfectly installing the gate at the bottom of the creek
Unstoppable effort building the rest of the steps down to the creek
Generous financial contributions for food organized
Summer in Bozeman is in full-swing, which means more opportunities to get out to our beautiful 5.3 acres and gather for community building, some site prep and enjoying the warm weather (while it lasts!)
Marianne, our resident Art teacher, helped coordinate a household flag making event at the property! Members designed and created flags for their households, planting them on the site of their future homes.
Jodi and Steve, of our Community Building Committee, organized the Great Bozeman Baking Show, Episode 1. Participants each made a Lemon Curd Tart with Olive Oil to bring to the virtual event, and shared their experiences, lessons learned, and variations they tried. The judges all agreed – the results were delicious!
The Bozeman Cohousers have been busy with some cleanup work on the property to help get ready for construction to begin in the Fall! We have a lot of fence posts to pull… thankfully, we also have a lot of heads to figure out the best way to do things! A little cohouser ingenuity, a few willing hands, and a big lever is helping get the job done!
The 4×4 van seemed like it would make quick work of this… but 8″ posts set 4 feet into the ground are pretty dang solid.
Winter is starting to fade in the rearview as we welcome the longer days and sunshine of Spring in Bozeman! Things are greening up around here, and we’re feeling renewed and optimistic about the great progress we’re making. To breaking ground in a few months, to life returning to a bit more normalcy, to our growing community and new connections!
We joined in some Earth Day activities with some pedal-powered goodness, thanks to new members Dan &Courtney, who lent out their awesome bike-attached blender to whip up some delicious smoothies for the passers-by!
Goats, of course. The kids still provide countless hours of fun and delight, and plenty of snuggles! They’ve even learned a few tricks 🙌 🥇
Preparing a Bo-Coho circus act…?
Mama likes a back massage, too!
Baby meetup
Litter box training 😄
Aurora offers a gentle song, Circle of Life, to lift Nellie‘s spirits after the loss of her yearling kid
We’re enjoying opportunities to gather and entertain at our future home site!
Jodi and Camas provide some stirring Bach melodies for a beautiful spring picnic at the property
As a college student getting ready to face the world, there are a lot of things I’ve had to start thinking about: jobs, bills, budgets, do I want to apply for another program or do I want to jump into the workforce, where do I want to live for the rest of my life? One of the things I never anticipated worrying about was housing. I always thought that I would live in a crappy little apartment for a couple of years before moving into a house of my own. But when I started looking for available housing options, I quickly discovered that it wasn’t going to be that easy.
There are a lot of different living options available today: single-family homes, shared living (or co-living), congregate housing, and cooperative housing are just a few examples. While shared living spaces are becoming more popular because of their affordability, the single-family home is still the most sought-after housing option. The single-family home provides its residents with their own space without having to worry about other occupants. However, this living style often unintentionally isolates its residents from others and is becoming increasingly hard to maintain, especially when family members have busy lives that make it hard to take care of daily domestic tasks and find time for their friends, family, or themselves.
In my search for an ideal living situation, I’ve discovered that many people are frustrated with the current options and their impacts on their daily lives, and have started to consider new ideas about what housing and community can look like. Curious, I began to dig deeper and found another living option called cohousing. In her book, Cohousing: a Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves, Kathryn McCamant argues that cohousing provides a serious template for living lighter on our planet and improving people’s quality of life in child- and senior-friendly neighborhoods (4). Cohousing produces a type of living environment that encourages its members to lean on each other for certain needs while still being able to retain a certain amount of autonomy. At first, I didn’t understand what the big deal was behind this housing movement. To me, cohousing seemed like any other suburban neighborhood. Before I dismissed the idea, I decided I had to know more, so I buried myself in research.
History of Cohousing
First, I wanted to look at the history behind the cohousing movement to get a grasp on its background, mainly how it developed and why it gained popularity. The idea of cohousing appeared only 50 years ago, and while it’s still fairly new, several groups have formed their own housing developments and redefined what community means to them. In more isolated living arrangements, community is often defined as “a group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common” (The Oxford Dictionary). When creating a new living option, potential members wanted a community that was different than simply living close to each other. They wanted to redefine community as “a feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals” (The Oxford Dictionary). As more cohousing developments are being designed and built, they take inspiration from the first developments and work to build a similarly-connected community. Considering these two different definitions of community, it started becoming clear to me why cohousing would have developed.
Looking back on my own life, living in my childhood single-family home hadn’t been anything too exciting. I had a younger sister and a dog to play with, but there weren’t many other children around. As a child, I used to ask my mom if I could run over to one of my friend’s houses and see if they wanted to play, but she always told me no – it wasn’t that easy. To play with any of my friends, playdates had to be scheduled in advance, then either myself or my friends had to be driven a couple of neighborhoods over. Our neighborhood didn’t have a sense of closeness, and we weren’t allowed to go anywhere by ourselves until we were old enough to understand the dangers of the world and could recognize safe places like police stations. Now, I can understand why people would want to build their own neighborhoods and create a more connected community, now I just wanted to know how it all began.
Sættedammen, Copenhagen, Denmark
The cohousing phenomenon started in two places. The first development was “built in 1972 outside Copenhagen, Denmark, by 27 families who wanted a greater sense of community than offered by suburban subdivisions or apartment complexes” (McCamant 5). Though they took a long time to get up and running, “the group that eventually developed Sunlight, in Oregon, began organizing in the 1970s along the lines of Danish cohousing but without any knowledge of others’ developing similar communities” (Fromm 93). These groups developed a community plan where each household has a private and self-sufficient residence with extensive shared common facilities within the neighborhood. The common facilities, especially the common dining hall where the community shares dinners, is the aspect of cohousing which makes it such a unique and favorable living environment for so many different groups of people. In her book, McCammant tells us that “by 2010, more than 70 of these communities have been built in Denmark, with many more planned” (5), and that “more than 120 cohousing communities have been built in North America, with another 50 plus in the planning phase or under construction” (4). These communities are not born out of isolated events, but are actively being sought out and built as a solution that feeds the housing needs of modern households. They continue to be sought out because of their innate ability to change and evolve as community needs change. These communities are built with the specific needs of their members in mind because they’re the ones who sit down and plan them.
Other Living Options
While cohousing communities use single-family homes for their residents to live in, it’s clear that these two living options are different. Traditional single-family neighborhoods focus solely on the building in which residents live, while cohousing focuses on the community built around these homes. However, cohousing isn’t the only living option that differs from the single-family home lifestyle that seems to frustrate people. While the information I have gathered this far has been helpful, I still didn’t know much about the other living options or why cohousing seems to be the preferred option.
Living Learning Communities
Yellowstone Hall, Montana State University
To better understand the different types of living options, I wanted to start with something I was very familiar with. Students who lived on campus might be familiar with Living Learning Communities, or LLCs, within the dorms. Montana State University has several of these LLC’s, which “allow students from similar disciplines to live in close proximity to each other. Residents of an LLC will share many of the same classes, professors and assignments as the person right next door. This model allows students to make connections and network with others in their program early in their college careers” (MSU Reslife). When I was a freshman and sophomore, I lived in an engineering LLC on campus. The entire hall of my dorm was filled with female engineering students. Living in such close proximity to people who were pursuing the same career path and had similar experiences helped me jump-start my college career. We studied, attended club events, and networked as a group. These kinds of tasks can be daunting for freshman and sophomore students, but our LLC set up a community for us where we could support each other because we all had similar experiences.
A Living Learning Community is not a permanent living situation, but students looking for a permanent home after dorm life might look into living in a cohousing community because it shares some of the same characteristics of living in an LLC. They both create a sense of community where residents share the same values as their neighbors, and are given the choice of how much they want to participate in community activities.
Shared Living
Another living arrangement that is popular with college age adults is shared living, where “several people rent or buy a house together. Each person has a private room and shares the rest of the house” (Fromm 269). Residents set up a small community within one house and each resident can choose how much to rely on the others, but the space is not one’s own. This living option is also somewhat familiar to me, as my friends and I were looking into moving off-campus for our final year and wanted to try renting a house together. This housing style appealed to us because we could live more independently, setting up our own community rules rather than adhere to the rules set up on-campus in the dorms. It was also cheaper to split rent on a four-bed, two-bath house than to continue to live on campus. While this seemed like an ideal housing arrangement, it quickly became a problem when two of our friends started dating, changing the dynamic of the small community we were trying to build. Ultimately, we decided to stop pursuing this living arrangement.
Shared living successfully creates a tight-knit community, but it sacrifices personal or private space to do so. The only space you can retreat to is your own bedroom, having to share a living room and kitchen with the rest of your housemates. Cohousing manages to balance the two ideals, giving its residents the best of both worlds with a completely autonomous housing unit and shared common spaces to encourage community bonding.
Congregate Housing
In his book, Collaborative Communities: Cohousing, Central Living, and Other New Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities, Dorit Fromm describes congregate housing, explaining “support services such as cooking and cleaning are available from a staff to help residents… Living units are small; some have private baths or partial kitchens. Also in the same building are common spaces for group activities and meals” (269). Dorms on campus could be considered a type of congregate housing even though they aren’t permanent living situations. In the dorms, you have access to a communal kitchen and other common spaces, but the cooking is done for you in the dining halls, and most of the cleaning is completed by the custodial staff. In terms of a more permanent living situation, most people would easily recognize this style of living in senior homes or other assisted living communities.
While congregate housing and cohousing both have common facilities to promote a sense of community, the living units in congregate housing aren’t completely autonomous. Like shared-living options, congregate housing does a good job of creating a community for its residents, but still forgets to provide coveted personal space where you can perform domestic tasks yourself should you ever want to.
Cooperative housing
Cooperative housing is the closest living option to cohousing. It involves “private self-contained units with shared ownership of certain common elements… members do not own their units individually; instead, they have one membership in the cooperative” (Fromm 269). Cooperative housing gives people the same freedom as cohousing does by setting up each unit to be autonomous while also providing shared spaces for connected communities. The main difference between these two living options is that a resident owns their own space in a cohousing community, whereas in cooperative communities they pay for a membership that allows them to live there, much like a rental agreement.
Cooperative Village, Lower East Side, Manhattan
An interesting example of this type of living is called “The Vertical Street.” This community resides completely within an old apartment building which has been “renovated into collaborative housing… The stairway is the link between apartments and the common spaces, similar to a pedestrian street along a cluster of houses… the corridors, passageways, and landings, are now jointly furnished and used in common” (Fromm 139-140).
This is a great option for people who are looking to leave a standard living situation in favor of a community that has a greater support network, but residents still don’t own their own space. In cohousing communities, residents own their completely self-sufficient home in a community that is set up to support its members.
Cohousing Communities
Now that I have explored the different options available, it’s becoming easier to understand what makes cohousing unique. Cohousing balances the desire to have personal and private space with the human need to connect to others and be involved in a supportive community. Each cohousing community is a little different depending on what members want to get out of this living style, as potential residents can be very active in the planning of their new community.
Bozeman Cohousing
As a student of Montana State University, I wanted to check out the cohousing option in the city I have grown to love. Bozeman Cohousing is a living community that promotes a culture of sharing and interaction between its residents. Houses will be built in clusters that share common spaces outside. Its neighborhood is designed specifically to create a supportive, respectful, and friendly community with an emphasis on sustainability. A lot of Bozeman Cohousing community members also favor the idea of an urban agricultural environment, so the community has plans for a shared garden and goats… yes, goats!
Bozeman Cohousing Atrium concept by Studio Co+Hab
They also plan on sharing guest houses, so when residents want people to stay with them for any length of time, guests have their own space to relax in without feeling like they’re intruding on the host’s space. This feature can help take a lot of pressure off of both the residents and their guests that can sometimes accompany travel. Site plans have been submitted to the city, and this is a huge step in building the ideal community space for its future residents. But it takes more than just constructing the actual building to create a connected and friendly community.
Members of the community are asked to contribute and engage in a couple of different ways. Each adult will cook once a month for the rest of the community, providing residents with dinners they don’t have to worry about five times a week. This takes a lot of pressure off family members who are just coming home from their busy lives and encourages members to be a part of the community. Cohousing members are also asked to participate in governing their community. Decisions about how the community will work are voted on by each household and are only implemented if they have reached a consensus. While this strategy isn’t the easiest choice when it comes to governing a group, it works to ensure that everyone feels like they have a voice, and generates a strong feeling of satisfaction when decisions are reached.
Conclusion
In my quest for housing, I found myself lost and confused by all the options I previously hadn’t known about. I dug into the topic until I felt I had a good understanding about the different types of living options available, and when I came across a new housing option called cohousing, I just had to know more.
The concept of cohousing has fascinated me since I started learning about it. At first, I didn’t really understand what the big deal was. Cohousing just seemed like a fancy term for “gated community.” As I continued investigating, I learned that cohousing was not at all what I expected. It can offer its members a solid support system within their own community and opportunities to connect with their neighbors on a deeper level than in standard neighborhoods. Residents have found a way to balance a sense of privacy and a sense of community in a way that works for them.
For anyone who wants to try living a more connected and lighter life, cohousing is an appealing solution. While cohousing is just one of many living options available today, its growing popularity over the years indicates that this living arrangement is more than a fad – it’s a housing option that many are looking for.
Coming straight out of college, I know cohousing isn’t the best option for me. I know that I need to find a cheap apartment that I can rent out until I can stand on my own two feet. But my long-term plan has changed. Before I started getting into this, I wanted to find a single-family home, and now it’s my second-choice option. When it’s time for me to find my own space, I’ll be looking for cohousing.
As the pandemic restrictions ease and we come out of our year-long cocoons, we are all hungry for human contact. The members of Bozeman Cohousing are dreaming of when we live nearby and can conveniently and spontaneously socialize and enjoy each other’s company. This image is certainly motivating, but is just the tip of the intentional living iceberg. Let’s look at a big part of what’s under the surface.
Governance is a wonky, decidedly un-spontaneous, but nonetheless essential, part of living in cohousing. Simply put, it’s how we make decisions that benefit all of us. We Americans are used to a simple majority rule system, where the most votes for or against a proposal wins. But just because we’re used to it doesn’t mean it’s the best. It’s not at all hard to think of many situations both personal and on the public political scene where a majority vote has led to many flavors of alienation and discontent. In our small community, that could seriously harm our relationships and even the organization.
Enter the consensus paradigm. If majority voting rests on its simplicity, the crown jewel of consensus is that there are no winners and losers. And while feathers may still be ruffled, the consensus process strives to ensure that everyone is heard and that their needs are accounted for as best as they can. Honestly, coming to consensus can feel tedious and frustrating. But I’ve also experienced deep satisfaction when we’ve reached a conclusion that feels reasonable to everyone.
So how does this work exactly? Instead of a single yes/no vote, our consensus process runs in a spiral of “tests for consensus” to reach a decision. Each pass around the spiral, members are asked to express whether they “support it enthusiastically,” “can live with it,” or “no, it absolutely doesn’t work for me.” The gold standard is to have the entire group fully support the proposal. Depending on the issue, a few hesitations may have to remain. But even a single no vote is not just a residual minority view; it is a show-stopper. Everyone who expressed a concern is invited to share those concerns with the community. In turn, the community is invited to be both open and creative about how to address the concerns. The proposal must then be changed until everyone can at least live with it, or additional information may help the concerned person be ok with the proposal after all.
This can definitely be hard work. We each have our own preferences, experiences, and worries. But we all have also committed to the shared values of our Vision Statement, and as we consider our own votes, we are asked to consider how the proposal benefits the community as a whole and not just us. After several turns around the spiral, “it doesn’t work for me” is therefore something of a nuclear option that we are reminded only to use as a last resort.
Our group has been practicing the consensus process for just exactly two years now, incorporating more voices and perspectives as we grow. And like any skill that improves with practice, with every meeting, we are getting noticeably better at it. Just as we are working to build a physical environment out of sustainable materials and minimize ongoing resource use, our consensus process helps us make sustainable decisions that will endure and support us into the future. Now that is as exciting as sitting on the porch drinking coffee with friends.